chat icon

612-308-7763
info@gallatin-law.com

5665 147th St. N.
Hugo, MN 55038

 
Dan's Desk
Dan's Desk
(31) "knowingly" received (1) 18 (1) 1923 law (1) 2017 (1) 322C (1) 401c3 (2) 501B (1) 501C (1) abandonment (1) abogado (1) accident (2) account stated (1) accuracy (1) adult (1) adult children (1) adverse possession (1) aging in place (1) Angel Tax Credit (1) apparent purpose (1) application (1) april fool (1) arbitration (4) asset (3) at risk adult (1) attorney (81) attorny (1) bags of hope (1) behind the scenes issue (1) Bernard v. State of Minnesota (1) bi-lingual (1) biling├╝e (1) binding arbitration (1) biography (1) blog (1) boundary (1) builder (1) burden of proof (2) business (10) business law (6) business owner (1) buy (1) buyer (1) buying (2) cancellation (1) capitalism (1) charity (1) choice of law clause (1) civil (1) civil penalty (1) civil theft (1) class action (1) clear title (1) clients (1) college (2) commerce (2) commercial (1) commercial real estate (2) common knowledge (1) community (1) company (1) competing offers (1) competition (1) complaint (1) complementary areas of law (1) components of a case (1) conciliation court (1) Consumer complaints (1) context (1) contract (3) contract clauses (1) contract for deed (1) contractor (1) Contracts (4) conversion (1) corporation (1) county (2) court (4) crash (1) credit (1) current (1) damage (3) damages (1) death (1) Deceptive Trade Practices Suits (1) deed (1) default (1) defence (3) Department of Commerce (5) Department of Labor & Industry (1) disagreement (1) disclosure (3) discretion (1) dispute (1) divorce (1) doctor's associates (1) documentation (1) drinking (1) duty (1) DWI (3) easement (1) elder care (1) election (1) Elements of a Reprisal Action (1) employee (1) employees (1) employment (4) employment agreements (3) employment law (2) errors and omissions (1) espanol (1) estate (2) estate law (4) estate plan (2) estate planning (4) et al (1) et al. v. Nelson (1) ethics (1) eviction (3) Exculpatory (1) Exculpatory vs. Indemnity (1) expert (1) expert witness (1) fair labor standards act (1) fair play (1) family (2) family law (2) family practice (1) farm land (1) federal (2) federal holiday (1) fees (1) finance (1) FLSA (1) forest lake (2) foster care (1) founders insurance company v yates (1) fraud (1) funny (1) Gallatin Law (2) general liability (1) golf (1) good neighbor days (1) government (1) half-truth (1) happy hour (1) harassment (3) Harassment Restraining Order (1) HCD (2) health care directive (4) helping others (1) Hennepin County (1) hiring (1) historical court case (1) history (1) holiday (3) home ownership (2) home sale (1) honesty (1) hopeful (1) how to win a case (1) hugo (87) humor (1) Inc (1) incentives (1) Indemnity (1) injury (1) inspection (3) insurance (2) intellectual property (1) intent (1) internal reporting (1) intestate (1) investigation (2) investing (1) invoice (1) IP (1) IRS (4) issues with out of date references (1) jail (1) joint bank accounts (1) jokes (1) judge (2) judgement (1) July 1 changes (1) jurisdiction (2) jury (2) Jury Instructions (1) justice Scalia (1) know your industry rules (1) land (1) landlord (3) laughter (1) law (85) law basics (1) law firm (2) law suit (1) law update (1) laws (2) lawsuit (2) lawyer (92) lawyer client relationship (1) lawyer joke (1) lease (2) legacy (1) legal (79) legal advice (2) legal decisions (1) legal definition (1) legal issues (1) legal life (1) legal news (1) legal rights of owner (1) legal writing (1) liability (1) licence (1) license (2) licensed (1) licensed profession (1) licensure (1) life estate (1) Limited liability companies (1) Limited Liability Company (1) litigation (2) living trust (1) living will (1) LLC (3) LLC Act (1) LLC contract (1) local (3) long term care (1) malpractice (1) management (1) manager authority (1) meaning or utility (1) memories (1) metro (1) military (1) Minn. Stat. Section 513.33 (1) minnesota (76) Minnesota Court (2) Minnesota Court of Appeals (3) Minnesota Department of Commerce (3) minnesota small company (1) Minnesota-domiciled (1) minnisotia (1) misconduct (2) MN (87) MN court (1) modification (1) mortgage (4) mortgage origination (1) motives (1) multi cultural (1) Multi-Disciplinary Practice (1) multistate property (1) Naca v Macalaster (1) negligence (1) Negligent Misrepresentation (1) negocio (1) neighbors (1) network (1) news (4) NJK Holding (1) non compete (1) non disclosed problems (1) non payment (1) non profit (2) non-profit (1) non-standard clause (1) of NJK Holding Corp. v. The Araz Group (1) open estate (1) operating agreement (1) opinion (2) oral (1) oral contract (1) origination (1) OSHA (1) out of state (1) outdated trust (1) overtime (1) overworked (1) owner (1) parent rights (1) partially written (1) partner (1) Patterson Dental Supply v. Vlamis (1) Paulucci (1) penalty (1) personal (3) personal attention (1) personal liability (1) personal representation (1) personal rights (1) personal thoughts (1) Philosophy (1) piercing the corporate veil (1) planning (2) PLLC (1) PoA (3) pointers (1) political speech (1) political system (1) politics (2) positive (1) poster (1) power of attorney (4) prescriptive easement (1) president (1) prince (2) probate (6) proceedings subsequent action (1) process (1) professional (3) professional employees (1) professional insurance (1) professional license (1) proof (1) property (2) property damage (1) property dispute (1) property rights (1) protection (3) punitive (1) purchase agreement (3) quiet title action (1) ramsey county (1) reading (1) real estate (17) real estate law (1) real estate purchase agreements (1) real lawyer (1) realestate (11) reasonable (1) referral (1) regulation (1) regulator (2) rent (1) rental (1) reprisal (1) reprisal claim (1) required language (1) resolutions (1) responsibilities (1) restraining order (1) revocable trust (3) rights (4) risk (1) rule 8 (1) rules (2) rules v statutes (1) safety (1) sanctions (1) Santa (1) Schumacher v. Schumacher (1) self authored complaint (1) sell (1) seller (1) selling (2) sexual harassment (1) single discipline practice (1) small claims (1) social (1) sound business (1) spanish (1) Specious Suits (1) squatter (1) Stat. 45.02 (1) state agency (2) state court (1) state law (1) states rights (1) statute (1) statutes (1) statutorily protected conduct (1) stress (1) subd. 7(a)(3) (1) subtle rules of law (1) subway (1) summons (1) supreme court (2) suspended license (1) tax (1) taxable estate (1) taxes (2) tenant (4) tennant (1) Tennessen Warning (1) termination (1) thankful (1) thanks (1) thanksgiving (3) The Araz Group (1) Thomas Jefferson (1) title (2) TODD (1) Tortious Interference (1) trade (1) trade secret (1) transfer on death (1) transfer on death deed (1) trends (1) trespass (1) trial (3) troops (1) trump (1) trust (9) trustee (1) turkey (1) tv law (1) twin cities (1) twitter (1) ultra vires (1) under investigation (1) Unjust Enrichment (2) unlawful detainer (1) venue (2) venue clause (1) verdict (1) veteran (1) veteran's day (1) veterans day (1) victory (1) views (1) warm hearts for charity (1) warranty (1) washington county (1) what a lawyer should do (1) what you don't know can hurt you (1) whistleblower (1) whistleblower act (1) whistleblower law (1) white bear lake (2) will (10) wills (2) work life balance (1) working relationship (1) workplace (2) workplace law (1) write it down! (1) writing (1) written (1)
Dan@gallatin-law.com
1:09 PM

Minnesota Company vs. Pennsylania Resident: Does Minnesota have Jurisdiction



The test on whether Minnesota has jurisdiction over an out-of-state resident was recently addressed in Patterson Dental Supply v. Vlamis.  Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to require someone appear before that court.  As a matter of constitutionality, not every person in the United States can be made to appear in Minnesota for court.



Here are the most salient facts of Patterson Dental Supply v. Vlamis:


  1. Patterson Dental Supply is a Minnesota-domiciled company that conducts business on the east coast, including Pennsylvania
  2. Vlamis worked for Patterson Dental Supply, with his territories being Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York
  3. Vlamis never lived in Minnesota and never had a bank account in Minnesota
  4. Vlamis never owned property in Minnesota
  5. Since 1999 Vlamis came to Minnesota a total of 14 times, with the longest stretch being 4 weeks in 1999


The question the Court of Appeals (and District Court) had to answer was whether Vlamis had sufficient contact with Minnesota such that jurisdiction in Minnesota "does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice."  This is a wonderfully elegant statement, but difficult to forecast its application with much certainty. 


The Court of Appeals upheld the District Court's determination that Vlamis is subject to jurisdiction in Minnesota.  One line from the opinion I found interesting is "Pennsylvania is not so far awayMN to Pa map that requiring Vlamis to travel to Minnesota makes jurisdiction unreasonable."  Really?  Pennsylvania to Minnesota is not a day trip by any means!


A key point from this opinion is you just do not know for sure how a court will decide.  Here, the facts seemed quite favorable to Vlamis, but he lost.  For Minnesota employers seeking to enforce employment restrictions with its employees, this is a great case to support bringing suit in Minnesota even if the employee never lived here and rarely even visited here.



The material contained herein is provided for informational purposes only and is not legal advice, nor is it a substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. Each situation is unique, and you should not act or rely on any information contained herein without seeking the advice of an experienced attorney. All information contained in links are the property of the linked site.





Tags:

Dan has handled formation of international corporations through single member LLC’s looking to invoke all the corporate protections enjoyed by the most complex companies in the world.

 

More Info

Estate planning can be the most rewarding and emotionally challenging legal endeavor for any client. Dan carefully assists clients persevere through their estate planning process.

 

More Info

No two litigations are alike. The rules may not change, but the facts, client goal, and resolution options are never the same.

 

More Info

Dan has extensive experience representing and helping real estate buyers, sellers, agents, and business clients weave through the maze of residential real estate and commercial transactions.

 

More Info